TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Delhi High Court: Airline landing/parking charges are 'rent' under tax law</h1> <h3>United Airlines Versus Commissioner of Income-Tax And Others.</h3> United Airlines Versus Commissioner of Income-Tax And Others. - [2006] 287 ITR 281, 202 CTR 184, 152 TAXMANN 516 Issues:Interpretation of the term 'rent' under section 194-I of the Income-tax Act in relation to landing and parking charges at an airport.Analysis:The judgment delivered by the High Court of Delhi pertained to a writ petition challenging an order of the Commissioner of Income-tax regarding the classification of landing and parking charges paid by an airline as 'rent' under section 194-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The petitioner, an airline incorporated in the USA, argued that these charges should not be considered as rent under the provision. However, the court analyzed the definition of 'rent' as per Explanation (i) to section 194-I, which includes payments for the use of any land, building, or related structures, irrespective of ownership.The court emphasized that the legal definition of 'rent' under the Income-tax Act is broader than its common meaning. It explained that when an aircraft lands or parks at an airport, it involves the immediate use of the airport's land, thereby constituting a form of rent payment. The judgment highlighted that legal fictions, such as the interpretation of statutory definitions, are recognized in law to ensure clarity and consistency in tax statutes.Furthermore, the court underscored the principle of strict interpretation in taxing statutes, emphasizing that equity considerations are irrelevant in tax matters. Quoting precedents, the court reiterated that taxation is based on the explicit language of the law, and if a case does not strictly fall within the statutory provisions, no tax can be imposed. The judgment cited various legal cases to support the stance that tax laws are to be construed based on the plain language of the statute, without delving into subjective intentions or equitable considerations.In conclusion, the court upheld the Commissioner's order, ruling that landing and parking charges paid by the airline constituted 'rent' under section 194-I, as per the clear definition provided in the statute. The judgment emphasized that the literal interpretation of the law prevails in tax matters, and any ambiguity or alternative interpretations should align with the plain language of the statute. Therefore, the petition challenging the classification of these charges as rent was dismissed by the court.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
