Special tax statute and police investigation: ordinary criminal procedure remains available absent a clear exclusive mechanism.

The Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 was analysed as a special tax statute, but its investigative scheme was not shown to create an exclusive mechanism that displaced the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Sections 83 and 86 contemplated investigation by authorised officers and a Bureau of Investigation, yet no operative notification or valid authorisation was shown to oust ordinary police powers. Where the alleged conduct also disclosed offences under the Indian Penal Code, the existence of special VAT provisions did not by itself bar FIR registration or police investigation. The stated ratio is that a special statute ousts general criminal only where it clearly creates a complete and exclusive procedure.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the police lacked jurisdiction to register and investigate FIRs for offences arising out of alleged violations of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005, in view of the investigative scheme under that Act and the absence of notifications constituting or empowering the Bureau of Investigation. (ii) Whether the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005, by reason of being a special statute, excluded the operation of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and thereby rendered the impugned FIRs an abuse of process.

Issue (i): Whether the police lacked jurisdiction to register and investigate FIRs for offences arising out of alleged violations of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005, in view of the investigative scheme under that Act and the absence of notifications constituting or empowering the Bureau of Investigation.

Analysis: The statutory scheme showed that Section 83 empowered a Commissioner-authorised officer to investigate VAT offences, while Section 86 contemplated a Bureau of Investigation and possible vesting of police-station powers by notification. The repeal-and-savings provision in Section 94 preserved only those earlier notifications and orders that were in force and not inconsistent with the new Act. On the facts, no fresh notification under Section 86(2)(a) or valid authorisation under Section 83 was shown, and no operative notification vesting officer-in-charge powers in the Bureau was established. Mere constitution of the Bureau or existence of limited investigative power did not amount to an exclusion of ordinary police jurisdiction where the alleged acts also disclosed offences under the IPC.

Conclusion: The police were not shown to be divested of jurisdiction to register and investigate the FIRs.

Issue (ii): Whether the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005, by reason of being a special statute, excluded the operation of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and thereby rendered the impugned FIRs an abuse of process.

Analysis: Sections 4 and 5 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 apply to offences under other laws unless the special statute provides a clear and complete contrary procedure. The VAT Act did not constitute a complete code for investigation of offences that also attracted IPC provisions, nor did it prescribe an exclusive procedure displacing the Code. The doctrine of generalia specialibus non-derogant was held not to assist the petitioners because there was no irreconcilable conflict and no clear legislative intent to oust the police powers under the Code. The authorities relied upon by the petitioners were distinguished as either fact-specific, dealing with different statutory regimes, or no longer good law in light of the later Supreme Court position.

Conclusion: The VAT Act did not exclude the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the FIRs were not an abuse of process.

Final Conclusion: The challenge to the FIRs failed because the statutory scheme did not bar police investigation and the special-tax statute did not displace the general criminal procedure for offences also falling under the Indian Penal Code.

Ratio Decidendi: Unless a special statute clearly creates an exclusive and complete investigative mechanism, offences under that statute and the Indian Penal Code may be investigated under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the mere existence of a special investigatory provision does not by itself oust ordinary police jurisdiction.

---