Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a new cement unit falling within Item 1E of Annexure C to the sales tax incentive scheme could claim the higher exemption applicable to a prestigious unit under Item 4, or whether the specific cement-entry controlled the exemption entitlement.
Analysis: The Scheme, issued under Section 4(2) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954, classified industrial units for exemption purposes and separately introduced Item 1E for new cement units, prescribing exemption according to scale of investment. The Court held that Item 1E was a subject-specific and special provision for new cement units, while Items 4, 6 and 7 were general entries meant for industries across classes. Applying the rule that a special provision prevails over a general one, and reading the scheme as a whole, the Court concluded that the later specific cement entry was intended to govern the field for new cement units and could not be displaced by the broader prestigious-unit entry. The principle of liberal construction of exemption provisions could not override the express structure of the scheme.
Conclusion: The respondent-assessee was not entitled to 75% exemption as a prestigious unit and was entitled only to the exemption available under Item 1E for a large new cement unit.