TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>SEZ Act does not permit customs duty on goods supplied within SEZ, ruling proceedings illegal.</h1> <h3>TIRUPATI UDYOG LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA</h3> TIRUPATI UDYOG LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA - 2011 (272) E.L.T. 209 (A. P.) Issues Involved:1. Legality of proceedings by the Development Commissioner and Assistant Commissioner of Customs regarding export duty on chrome ore.2. Legality of proceedings and circulars related to export duty on steel products.3. Whether SEZ units or DTA suppliers are liable to pay export duty under the SEZ Act, 2005 or the Customs Act, 1962.4. Interpretation of the SEZ Act and the Customs Act regarding the levy of export duty.5. Applicability of legal fictions and non-obstante clauses in the SEZ Act.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Legality of Proceedings by Development Commissioner and Assistant Commissioner of Customs:The petitioners questioned the Development Commissioner's proceedings dated 17-04-2008 and the Assistant Commissioner of Customs' proceedings dated 08-05-2008 as illegal and void. The Development Commissioner directed that export consignments of SEZ units should be cleared after obtaining a bank guarantee covering the value of export duty on chrome ore. The Assistant Commissioner of Customs informed the petitioner that export duty was not payable by SEZ units procuring chrome ore from DTA suppliers, but DTA suppliers were required to pay export duty at Rs. 3,000/- per metric tonne on chrome ore exported to SEZ units.2. Legality of Proceedings and Circulars Related to Export Duty on Steel Products:The petitioners questioned the proceedings dated 30-06-2008 by the Director, SEZ Section, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, and the Circular dated 09-07-2008 by the Development Commissioner, Visakhapatnam SEZ. The Director informed that supply of steel products should be permitted only after payment of the prescribed amount of duty. The Development Commissioner reiterated this in the circular, and the Superintendent of Central Excise, Kottur Division, Hyderabad, informed that export liability should be discharged on iron and steel products cleared to the SEZ from 10-05-2008 onwards.3. Liability of SEZ Units or DTA Suppliers to Pay Export Duty:The petitioners argued that SEZ units are exempt from customs duty on goods imported into or exported from a Special Economic Zone under Section 26(1)(a) & (b) of the SEZ Act. They contended that SEZ units are not liable to pay export duty, and the proceedings requiring SEZ units to furnish bank guarantees towards export duty on chrome ore were without jurisdiction. The respondents argued that the Customs Act is not specified in the First Schedule to the SEZ Act and that DTA units are liable to pay export duty as per the Customs Act.4. Interpretation of the SEZ Act and Customs Act Regarding Levy of Export Duty:The court examined whether the DTA unit is liable to pay export duty on goods supplied to a unit within the SEZ under the SEZ Act, 2005 or the Customs Act, 1962. Article 265 of the Constitution prohibits the levy or collection of tax except by authority of law. The SEZ Act does not contain any provision for the levy and collection of export duty for goods supplied by a DTA unit to an SEZ unit for its authorized operations. The Customs Act provides for the levy of customs duty only on goods imported into or exported beyond the territorial waters of India.5. Applicability of Legal Fictions and Non-Obstante Clauses in the SEZ Act:Section 53(1) of the SEZ Act creates a legal fiction deeming a Special Economic Zone to be a territory outside the customs territory of India for authorized operations. However, this legal fiction is limited in scope and cannot be extended to levy customs duty. Section 51(1) of the SEZ Act contains a non-obstante clause, giving it overriding effect over other laws. However, in the absence of inconsistency between the SEZ Act and the Customs Act regarding the levy of customs duty, the non-obstante clause does not apply.Conclusion:The court concluded that neither the SEZ Act nor the Customs Act provides for the levy of customs duty on goods supplied from a DTA unit to a unit within a Special Economic Zone for its authorized operations. The impugned proceedings requiring SEZ units to furnish bank guarantees and DTA units to pay customs duty were quashed. The writ petitions were allowed without costs.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
