Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court Invalidates Assessment Orders Exceeding Time Limits</h1> <h3>S. NAJEEM AND S. SAJEEV, Philips India Limited. Versus COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, ANCHAL, KOLLAM DISTRICT, Assistant Commissioner (Assessment), Special Circle, Commercial Taxes, Aluva AND OTHERS</h3> S. NAJEEM AND S. SAJEEV, Philips India Limited. Versus COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, ANCHAL, KOLLAM DISTRICT, Assistant Commissioner (Assessment), Special ... Issues Involved:1. Period of limitation for invoking Section 25(1) or 25A of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003.2. Power exercised by the Deputy Commissioner under section 25B of the Act to extend the time for completing the assessment.3. Whether penalty proceedings could be taken against an assessee beyond the period specified under section 67(1) read with section 25(1) of the Act, or under section 45A read with section 19(1) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963.Detailed Analysis:Group-A: Limitation for Assessment under Section 25(1)- The petitioners contended that notices for assessment or assessment orders passed under section 25(1) were barred by limitation.- The court held that Section 25(1) permits the assessing authority to determine escaped turnover within five years from the last date of the year to which the return relates. The issuance of notice under Section 25(1) must occur within this period.- The third proviso to Section 25(1) extends the period for completing assessments but does not extend the period for issuing notices. Hence, notices issued beyond the five-year period are barred by limitation.- The court quashed the impugned assessment orders in all Group-A cases as they were issued beyond the statutory limitation period.Group-B: Extension of Time by Deputy Commissioner under Section 25B- Petitioners challenged notices and assessment orders issued under Section 25(1) based on orders by the Deputy Commissioner under Section 25B.- Section 25B allows the Deputy Commissioner to extend the period for completing assessments for good and sufficient reasons, but it does not extend the period for initiating proceedings under Section 25(1).- The court found that the Deputy Commissioner’s orders extending the time for assessment were issued beyond the period specified under Section 25(1) and lacked specific reasons.- Consequently, the court set aside the assessment orders in Group-B cases.Group-C: Orders under Section 25B- Petitioners challenged the orders passed by the Deputy Commissioner under Section 25B, contending that the power under Section 25B cannot be exercised beyond the period of limitation.- The court reiterated that the Deputy Commissioner’s orders extending time for completing assessments beyond the five-year period specified under Section 25(1) are invalid if no proceedings were initiated within the limitation period.- The court allowed the petitions, quashing the impugned orders issued under Section 25B.Group-D: Penalty Orders- Petitioners challenged penalty orders issued under Section 45A of the KGST Act and Section 67(1) of the KVAT Act, contending they were barred by limitation.- The court noted that Section 67(1) prescribes a definite outer time limit for finalizing penalty proceedings, which was initially one year and later extended to three years.- The court held that penalty proceedings must be completed within the statutory period from the date of detection of the offence. In this case, the penalty orders were issued beyond the period of limitation.- The court quashed the penalty orders in Group-D cases.Group-E: Orders under Section 25A- Petitioners challenged orders passed under Section 25A of the Act, contending they were beyond the period prescribed under Section 25(1).- Section 25A pertains to assessments based on audit objections and requires an audit report from the Comptroller and Auditor General.- The court found that the notices were issued under Section 25(1) and were beyond the time specified.- The court quashed the impugned orders in Group-E cases.Conclusion:- The court emphasized that the statutory periods of limitation must be strictly adhered to, and any extension of time for completing assessments or penalty proceedings must be within the framework of the law.- The court quashed the impugned orders in all the groups, providing relief to the petitioners.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found