Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order under section 25A of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 could be sustained when the self-assessment had already been completed and the proceedings were initiated after expiry of the statutory limitation period.
Analysis: The return for the relevant year had already resulted in self-assessment under section 21 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The challenge was that the first assessment action under section 25A was taken after the five-year limitation period had expired. The matter was treated as covered by earlier binding decisions of the same Court, and the assessment was also noted to be ex parte with disputed service of notice. On that basis, the impugned order was found unsustainable.
Conclusion: The impugned assessment order under section 25A of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was quashed in favour of the petitioner.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded and the assessment was set aside on the ground that action was taken beyond the permissible statutory period.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a self-assessment has already crystallised under the VAT law, reassessment or further assessment cannot validly be completed after the statutory limitation period has expired.