Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty imposed under section 14 of the A.P. General Sales Tax Act was barred by limitation.
Analysis: The relevant assessment year was 1964-65. The penalty was first levied, set aside in appeal, restored in revisional proceedings, remanded, and finally imposed again in 1975. The question was whether the period prescribed for making an assessment under section 14(1) could be applied to penalty proceedings under section 14(2). The Court followed its earlier view that penalty proceedings are not independent of the assessment process but are ancillary to it, and that when assessment itself is barred, the levy of penalty cannot survive on a higher footing. The Court also distinguished the Supreme Court decision relied upon by the Revenue, holding that it dealt with inferring limitation by analogy in a different statutory setting and did not displace the principle applicable here.
Conclusion: The penalty order dated 7 November 1975 was held to be barred by limitation and the revision failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where penalty proceedings are ancillary to assessment proceedings, the limitation applicable to the assessment governs the penalty as well, and a period of limitation cannot be inferred or denied by treating the penalty as wholly independent of the assessment.