Modvat credit for captive power fuel oils upheld where electricity was used in the manufacturing process.

The Larger Bench held that conflicting decisions and the statutory scheme permitted constitution of a Larger Bench, so the jurisdictional objection failed. On Modvat, it construed pre-16-3-1995 Rule 57A to include fuel oils used as inputs for captive electricity generation where the electricity was consumed in manufacture. Rule 57D(2) was treated as protective, not a precondition for credit, and the later specific reference to inputs used for generation of electricity was held not to exclude earlier coverage or operate retrospectively. One member dissented, taking the view that electricity generation was a separate activity and credit was unavailable before 16-3-1995.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the Tribunal's Larger Bench was validly constituted to hear the reference; (ii) whether, prior to 16-3-1995, fuel oils used for captive generation of electricity were eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

Issue (i): Whether the Tribunal's Larger Bench was validly constituted to hear the reference.

Analysis: The referring order was challenged on the ground that the Bench had not expressed a view on the correctness of conflicting decisions and that no power existed to constitute a Larger Bench. The decision on the President's power to constitute a Larger Bench was examined in the light of the statutory scheme for references and bench constitution. The existence of conflicting views was treated as a valid basis for reference, and the prior recall of one contrary decision did not affect the validity of a reference already made.

Conclusion: The Larger Bench was validly constituted and the jurisdictional objection failed.

Issue (ii): Whether, prior to 16-3-1995, fuel oils used for captive generation of electricity were eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

Analysis: The majority construed Rule 57A and its Explanation as it stood before 16-3-1995. It held that "inputs used as fuel" fell within the inclusive definition of inputs, and that fuel oils used to generate electricity consumed in the manufacturing process were used in or in relation to manufacture. Rule 57D(2) was treated as a protective provision and not as a condition precedent for availing credit. The later insertion of the provision covering inputs used for generation of electricity was held not to exclude fuel oils already covered by the earlier clause, nor to operate retrospectively. The construction adopted was supported by the integrated nature of the manufacturing process and by the principle that an inclusive definition expands, rather than restricts, the scope of the expression defined.

Conclusion: Fuel oils used for captive generation of electricity were eligible for Modvat credit prior to 16-3-1995, and the assessee's claim succeeded on the merits.

Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the assessees on the Modvat issue, and the majority upheld credit eligibility for fuel oils used in captive power generation feeding the manufacturing process.

Ratio Decidendi: Where fuel is used as an input for captive generation of electricity that is consumed in the manufacturing process, it is used in or in relation to manufacture within Rule 57A, and the later specific inclusion of inputs used for generation of electricity does not negate the earlier coverage of fuel oils.

Dissenting Opinion: One Member held that, before 16-3-1995, electricity generation was a separate activity and fuel oils used for that purpose were not eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57A; on that view, the assessees' appeals would have been dismissed and the Revenue's appeals allowed.

---