Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether LDO used in the burner as fuel for heating iron sheets and rods was an eligible input for Modvat credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, and whether the credit was barred on the premise that the fuel was used for generation of electricity.
Analysis: The period in dispute preceded the amendment that specifically brought inputs used for generation of electricity within the Modvat scheme. The decisive question, however, was factual: whether LDO was in fact being used to generate electricity or was being used as fuel in the burner for heating the goods. On the facts accepted by the lower authorities, LDO was used as fuel in the manufacturing process, and not as an input for electricity generation. The benefit of Notification No. 4/94-C.E. (N.T.) was therefore available, and the Revenue's contrary premise was rejected.
Conclusion: LDO used as fuel for the manufacture of forgings was eligible for Modvat credit, and the Revenue's challenge failed.