Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on capital goods and inputs used in the manufacture of cotton yarn could be denied merely because an intermediate product, namely carded/combed cotton or sliver, emerged during the manufacturing process and was exempt from duty.
Analysis: Rule 57R(2) contemplates that credit on specified capital goods is not to be denied or varied merely because intermediate products come into existence during manufacture, provided the finished product is dutiable. The fact that the intermediate product was classified under Heading 52.02 only from a later date did not justify denial of credit for capital goods used in the overall manufacturing stream. The reasoning was reinforced by the settled position that such intermediate sliver was not marketable and by the Board's clarification that credit should not be denied where exempt intermediate products are used captively in the manufacture of dutiable final goods.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible and could not be denied to the assessees.