Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on capital goods used in the manufacture of intermediate products captively consumed in the production of dutiable final products was admissible even though the relevant heading was specifically excluded under Rule 57Q.
Analysis: The credit claim related to capital goods used in the manufacture of sliver, an intermediate product falling under Chapter Heading 5202 and used captively in the manufacture of cotton yarn. The reasoning applied was that credit on capital goods should not be denied merely because the intermediate product was exempt or specifically excluded, where the goods were used in the chain of manufacture of final products chargeable to duty. The earlier view adopted by the Tribunal and the binding precedents relied upon supported allowance of credit in such circumstances.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to Modvat credit on the capital goods, and the exclusion under Rule 57Q did not bar the claim in the facts of the case.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed and the Tribunal's order allowing the credit was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Modvat credit on capital goods cannot be denied solely because they are used for manufacturing intermediate exempt products when those products are captively consumed in the manufacture of dutiable final goods.