Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on furnace oil sent directly to a job worker for generation of electricity, where the electricity was used in the manufacture of the appellant's final product.
Analysis: The relevant provisions permitted credit where inputs were sent to a job worker for further processing or for any other purpose and were received back within the stipulated period. The furnace oil was admittedly sent to the job worker, used for generating electricity, and the electricity was supplied back to the appellant within 180 days. The fact that electricity was not an excisable product did not matter because that was not a condition under the rule. The absence of prior physical receipt of the inputs in the appellant's factory also did not defeat credit when the inputs were sent outside for job work and the other conditions stood satisfied. The definition of inputs was wide enough to cover fuel used in or in relation to manufacture.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit on the furnace oil was admissible and the denial of credit was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the demand was set aside because the job-work arrangement and use of the fuel for generation of electricity fell within the Cenvat credit scheme.
Ratio Decidendi: Inputs sent to a job worker for processing or any other purpose remain eligible for Cenvat credit when the statutory conditions are satisfied, and credit cannot be denied merely because the intermediate electricity generated is non-excisable or because the inputs were not first received in the principal manufacturer's factory.