TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether furnace oil used as fuel for generating electricity, which was in turn used in the manufacture of the final product through an intermediate stage, was eligible for Modvat credit for the period prior to 16-3-1995. (ii) Whether the portion of electricity consumed in the township area could support Modvat credit on the furnace oil used for its generation.
Issue (i): Whether furnace oil used as fuel for generating electricity, which was in turn used in the manufacture of the final product through an intermediate stage, was eligible for Modvat credit for the period prior to 16-3-1995.
Analysis: The electricity generated from furnace oil was used captively in the manufacturing chain, and the intermediate product was treated as falling within the exemptive framework applicable to inputs used in the manufacture of dutiable final products. Rule 57D(2) protected credit where an exempted product emerged only at an intermediate stage and was further used in the manufacture of the duty-paid final product. The credit could therefore not be denied merely because electricity was first generated before being used in the manufacturing process.
Conclusion: The credit on furnace oil used for generating electricity for the manufacturing process was admissible and the assessee succeeded on this issue.
Issue (ii): Whether the portion of electricity consumed in the township area could support Modvat credit on the furnace oil used for its generation.
Analysis: Electricity consumed in the township area was not used in or in relation to the manufacture of the final product. The causal nexus required for Modvat credit was absent for that portion of consumption, so the corresponding furnace oil did not qualify as an input eligible for credit.
Conclusion: The credit attributable to furnace oil used for generating electricity consumed in the township area was not admissible and this issue was decided against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: Modvat credit was allowed for the furnace oil attributable to electricity used in the manufacturing process, but disallowed for the portion relating to township consumption.
Ratio Decidendi: Credit on an input used to generate electricity is allowable when the electricity is captively used in the manufacture of dutiable final products, but not when the electricity is used for non-manufacturing purposes such as township consumption.
TaxTMI 
