Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be denied on Low Sulphur Heavy Stock used for captive generation of electricity, where the electricity was used in the manufacture of dutiable final products.
Analysis: The dispute was governed by the Larger Bench decision holding that Modvat credit is admissible on inputs such as LSHS, including fuel used for captive generation of electricity, when such electricity is in turn used in the manufacture of final products. As a coordinate Bench, the Tribunal followed that ratio and declined to take a different view, noting that the matter was still pending before the Supreme Court but that the binding precedent remained operative.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on LSHS was admissible, and the denial of credit was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the assessee's appeal succeeded with consequential relief as admissible in law.
Ratio Decidendi: Modvat credit cannot be denied on fuel used for captive generation of electricity when that electricity is employed in the manufacture of dutiable final products, and coordinate Benches must follow the ratio of a Larger Bench decision.