Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit is admissible on parts of carding machinery used in the manufacture of sliver, an intermediate product, when the sliver is captively consumed in the manufacture of dutiable cotton yarn.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the character and use of the impugned items as parts of the carding machine and on the admissibility of Modvat credit where an intermediate product emerges in the course of manufacture of the final dutiable product. Rule 57R(2) protects credit on capital goods from being denied merely because an intermediate product comes into existence during manufacture of the final product. The settled position applied in the earlier Bench decision was that credit cannot be denied where the capital goods are used in the overall process leading to a dutiable final product, and the emergence of an intermediate product does not defeat eligibility. The Board circular relied upon also clarified that credit should not be denied on capital goods used in the manufacture of exempt intermediate products used captively for dutiable finished goods.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on the parts of the carding machine was admissible, and the Revenue's appeal failed.