Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether inputs used as fuel for generation of steam within the factory were excluded from the operation of Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 so as to negate the demand for reversal or payment of 8% of the price of exempted goods; (ii) Whether Modvat credit was admissible on duty-paid RFO used for generation of steam under Rule 57B(1)(iv) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Issue (i): Whether inputs used as fuel for generation of steam within the factory were excluded from the operation of Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 so as to negate the demand for reversal or payment of 8% of the price of exempted goods.
Analysis: Rule 57CC applied to inputs used in or in relation to manufacture of dutiable and exempted final products, but it expressly excluded inputs used as fuel. The Court read Rule 57CC together with the related provisions and held that where the input is established to be used as fuel, the requirement of maintaining separate accounts and the consequential 8% payment under Rule 57CC did not apply. The factual position that RFO was used only as fuel for generating steam was undisputed.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Issue (ii): Whether Modvat credit was admissible on duty-paid RFO used for generation of steam under Rule 57B(1)(iv) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: Rule 57B(1)(iv) specifically allowed credit on goods used for generation of electricity or steam used for manufacture of final products or for any other purpose within the factory of production. Applying that rule, and following the settled position referred to in earlier decisions, the Court held that duty-paid RFO used in boilers for generation of steam remained an eligible input for Modvat credit, irrespective of whether the steam ultimately supported manufacture of dutiable or exempted goods.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The revenue appeals failed because the disputed RFO was a fuel input used for generating steam within the factory and was covered by the fuel exclusion as well as the specific credit entitlement for steam-generation inputs.
Ratio Decidendi: Inputs used as fuel for generating steam within the factory are outside the mischief of Rule 57CC, and duty-paid inputs used for generation of steam remain creditable under the specific credit-allowing provision for steam-generation inputs.