TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a partnership formed to carry on wagering transactions was unlawful under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 on the grounds that the object was forbidden by law, opposed to public policy, or immoral.
Analysis: Wagering contracts were held to be void under Section 30 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, but voidness was distinguished from illegality. The governing principle applied was that an agreement is unlawful under Section 23 only when its object is forbidden by law, opposed to public policy, or immoral in the legal sense. The Court held that wagers had never been treated as forbidden by law in India or under the common law tradition relied upon in the Act, and that collateral agreements connected with wagering transactions had been enforceable. The Court further held that no recognised head of public policy invalidated wagering partnerships, and that the statutory notion of immorality in contracts was confined to sexual immorality and did not extend to wagers. The partnership, therefore, remained a collateral agreement and was not rendered unlawful merely because its object was to deal in wagering transactions.
Conclusion: The partnership was not unlawful under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and the challenge to enforceability failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A wagering agreement may be void, yet it is not illegal or forbidden by law, and a collateral partnership or other ancillary contract based on such wagering transactions is not rendered unlawful unless it falls within a recognised head of public policy or legal immorality.
TaxTMI 
