Public policy bars deduction of welfare fund payments made to secure export permits under income tax law

Payments made to a district welfare fund as a pre-condition for obtaining export permits for rice were treated as deductible business expenditure only if they could fall within section 37(1). The Court held that a contribution made to secure favourable official action is not an ordinary business outgoing merely because it is commercially expedient, and expenditure opposed to public policy is outside the scope of allowable deduction. Such payments, linked to official permit approval rather than a voluntary contribution, were therefore not deductible and were treated as hit by public policy.

---

---

Issues: Whether the amounts paid to the district welfare fund for obtaining export permits for rice were allowable as business expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether such payments were excluded by reason of public policy.

Analysis: The assessees' payments were found to be a pre-condition for the grant of export permits and not a mere voluntary contribution. A payment made to secure favourable official action on permits cannot be treated as an ordinary business outgoing merely because it is commercially expedient. Expenditure incurred for a purpose opposed to public policy is outside the scope of allowable deduction under section 37(1), because public officials are expected to act on merits and not in consideration of contributions to a fund or organisation. The Court rejected the view that such payments could be supported as deductible business expenditure on the ground of business necessity or expediency.

Conclusion: The contributions to the welfare fund were not allowable as business expenditure and were hit by public policy; the reference was answered against the assessees and in favour of the Revenue.

---