Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revisional court should interfere with the order refusing temporary injunction in a suit challenging the transfer of shares and nomination of directors, and whether the pleadings disclosed a prima facie case in view of the contractual terms and the alleged bar under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985.
Analysis: The agreement permitted transfer of equity shares and assignment of rights, and the relevant clauses were construed harmoniously to hold that transferability was not barred. The shareholders' agreement could not operate contrary to the articles of association, and the nominee directors had already been appointed before the suit. In deciding interim relief, the ordinary tests of prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury governed the matter. The contention that the civil court's jurisdiction was wholly excluded under Section 26 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 was not accepted at that stage, but the court found that the petitioners had not established a prima facie case for injunction.
Conclusion: The refusal to grant temporary injunction was upheld and no interference was warranted.