https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192498 A wagering agreement may be void under Section 30 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, but it is not for that reason illegal under Section 23. The Court held that wagers were not forbidden by law, no recognised head of public policy invalidated a partnership formed to deal in wagering transactions, and the statutory concept of immorality did not extend beyond sexual immorality. The collateral partnership therefore remained enforceable and was not rendered unlawful merely because its object related to wagering. en-us Thu, 26 Mar 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Jul 2025 11:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192498 A wagering agreement may be void under Section 30 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, but it is not for that reason illegal under Section 23. The Court held that wagers were not forbidden by law, no recognised head of public policy invalidated a partnership formed to deal in wagering transactions, and the statutory concept of immorality did not extend beyond sexual immorality. The collateral partnership therefore remained enforceable and was not rendered unlawful merely because its object related to wagering. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 26 Mar 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192498