Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2010 (2) TMI 1118 - SC - Indian Laws

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Judicial review permits CBI investigation without State consent in exceptional cases to secure fair and impartial inquiry. Constitutional courts' power of judicial review under Articles 32 and 226 is not curtailed by Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Judicial review permits CBI investigation without State consent in exceptional cases to secure fair and impartial inquiry.

                          Constitutional courts' power of judicial review under Articles 32 and 226 is not curtailed by Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 or by the federal distribution of powers under Article 246. In exceptional cases, a High Court may direct a CBI investigation within a State without State consent where necessary to enforce fundamental rights, preserve the rule of law, and secure a fair and impartial investigation. Article 21 is treated as protecting the right to an effective investigation for both accused persons and victims, and judicial intervention is justified only sparingly when local investigation lacks credibility or fairness.




                          Issues: (i) Whether the constitutional scheme and the doctrine of separation of powers bar a High Court from directing investigation by the CBI under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without the consent of the State Government, despite Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946. (ii) Whether the power of judicial review under Articles 32 and 226, as an integral part of the basic structure, permits constitutional courts to issue such a direction to secure fundamental rights and a fair and impartial investigation.

                          Issue (i): Whether the constitutional scheme and the doctrine of separation of powers bar a High Court from directing investigation by the CBI under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without the consent of the State Government, despite Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946.

                          Analysis: The distribution of legislative powers under Article 246 and the State-consent requirement in Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 restrict the executive and legislative reach of the Union in relation to police powers outside the State. However, those restrictions do not operate as a curb on the constitutional power of judicial review exercised by High Courts under Article 226. The constitutional court acts to uphold the Constitution, and directing an investigation in an exceptional case does not amount to an intrusion by one organ into the exclusive legislative field of another. The federal structure is preserved, not violated, when courts intervene to enforce constitutional guarantees and maintain the rule of law.

                          Conclusion: The High Court is not barred from directing CBI investigation without State consent in an appropriate case; the direction is valid in law and does not violate the federal structure or separation of powers.

                          Issue (ii): Whether the power of judicial review under Articles 32 and 226, as an integral part of the basic structure, permits constitutional courts to issue such a direction to secure fundamental rights and a fair and impartial investigation.

                          Analysis: Fundamental rights in Part III are inherent and cannot be abrogated or diluted by legislative or constitutional action contrary to the basic structure. Article 21 protects life and personal liberty and includes the right to a fair and impartial investigation, not only for the accused but also for victims. Articles 32 and 226 confer wide constitutional remedies, and judicial review is essential to enforce those rights and to test whether constitutional limitations have been transgressed. Where exceptional facts show that local investigation lacks credibility or fairness, constitutional courts may direct an independent agency to investigate so that fundamental rights are made effective in practice.

                          Conclusion: Constitutional courts may direct CBI investigation under Articles 32 and 226 in exceptional situations to protect fundamental rights and secure fair investigation.

                          Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the power of the High Court to order CBI investigation in an appropriate case, and the impugned direction was sustained, subject to the court's duty to exercise that power sparingly and only in exceptional circumstances.

                          Ratio Decidendi: The constitutional power of judicial review under Articles 32 and 226 cannot be curtailed by Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946, and a constitutional court may direct CBI investigation within a State without State consent where necessary to enforce fundamental rights and ensure a fair and impartial investigation in exceptional cases.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found