Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petition disclosed territorial jurisdiction and whether the challenge to the FIR, the earlier preliminary inquiry, the alleged non-compliance with mandatory consent under the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, the alleged breach of CBI Manual guidelines, and the apprehended arrest justified interim protection pending final hearing.
Analysis: The petition raised substantial objections touching territorial jurisdiction, maintainability, the legality of registration of the FIR, the effect of the closure of an earlier preliminary inquiry, the need for State consent before investigation and raid, and the scope of CBI powers under the governing statutory framework and manual guidelines. On the materials placed before the Court, a prima facie case was found for interim consideration, and the balance of convenience and likelihood of irreparable injury were treated as favouring interim protection. The Court therefore permitted the investigation to continue, but restrained recording of the petitioners' statements without leave of the Court, disallowed arrest at that stage, and prohibited filing of the challan without express leave.
Outcome: Notice issued. Interim protection granted in favour of the petitioners. Investigation permitted to continue subject to the stated restrictions.