Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the investigation of the large number of FIRs registered against the petitioner and other members of GJM should be transferred en masse to an independent agency under Article 32.
Analysis: Transfer of investigation to a central or independent agency is an extraordinary power to be exercised sparingly, cautiously and only in rare and exceptional cases where it is necessary to secure a fair investigation, instil public confidence, or where the State investigation is shown to be tainted or biased. The petitioner sought transfer of all FIRs collectively, including future cases, but the record disclosed serious allegations of violence, arson, public disorder and offences against life and property. The Court held that such broad relief cannot be granted in the abstract or on generalized allegations of bias. Each case has to be considered on its own facts, and the petition did not disclose material showing that the State police or State machinery were biased against the petitioner in a manner justifying wholesale transfer of investigation. The Court also distinguished precedents where transfer had been ordered at the instance of victims in specific factual settings.
Conclusion: The request for transfer of investigation was rejected and the writ petition was dismissed.