Faceless assessment and registration procedures are updated through electronic communication, revised recovery rules, extended deadlines, and replacem...
Risk-based selective vessel boarding requires accurate declarations and preserves master and agent liability where physical inspections are not select...
Permanent-establishment reassessment cannot revisit scrutinised disclosures; extended reopening fails without undisclosed material facts and within st...
Maintainability of a writ under Article 226 is limited where an alternative statutory appeal exists and the impugned orders arise from rectification proceedings under Section 161 of the GST Act; the court found no pleaded illegality and noted the petitioner received personal hearing before rectification orders were passed, so disputed questions of fact and the availability of an appeal precluded exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction. Outcome: writ petition dismissed and petitioner left to pursue the statutory appellate remedy.
Maintainability of a writ under Article 226 is limited where an alternative statutory appeal exists and the impugned orders arise from rectification proceedings under Section 161 of the GST Act; the court found no pleaded illegality and noted the petitioner received personal hearing before rectification orders were passed, so disputed questions of fact and the availability of an appeal precluded exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction. Outcome: writ petition dismissed and petitioner left to pursue the statutory appellate remedy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
