Faceless assessment and registration procedures are updated through electronic communication, revised recovery rules, extended deadlines, and replacem...
Risk-based selective vessel boarding requires accurate declarations and preserves master and agent liability where physical inspections are not select...
Permanent-establishment reassessment cannot revisit scrutinised disclosures; extended reopening fails without undisclosed material facts and within st...
The HC set aside the order confiscating appellant's properties under Schedule 'A', recognizing appellant's ownership rights. It held that the fixed deposit furnished by late Sri. G.E. Veerabharappa to the extent of Rs. 1,72,40,951/- should have been considered the asset involved in money laundering, instead of confiscating appellant's properties worth more than that amount u/s 8(5) PMLA. The appeal against the confiscation order was allowed.
The HC set aside the order confiscating appellant's properties under Schedule 'A', recognizing appellant's ownership rights. It held that the fixed deposit furnished by late Sri. G.E. Veerabharappa to the extent of Rs. 1,72,40,951/- should have been considered the asset involved in money laundering, instead of confiscating appellant's properties worth more than that amount u/s 8(5) PMLA. The appeal against the confiscation order was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.