https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84327 The HC set aside the order confiscating appellant's properties under Schedule 'A', recognizing appellant's ownership rights. It held that the fixed deposit furnished by late Sri. G.E. Veerabharappa to the extent of Rs. 1,72,40,951/- should have been considered the asset involved in money laundering, instead of confiscating appellant's properties worth more than that amount u/s 8(5) PMLA. The appeal against the confiscation order was allowed. en-us Fri, 27 Dec 2024 09:00:37 +0530 Fri, 27 Dec 2024 09:00:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84327 The HC set aside the order confiscating appellant's properties under Schedule 'A', recognizing appellant's ownership rights. It held that the fixed deposit furnished by late Sri. G.E. Veerabharappa to the extent of Rs. 1,72,40,951/- should have been considered the asset involved in money laundering, instead of confiscating appellant's properties worth more than that amount u/s 8(5) PMLA. The appeal against the confiscation order was allowed. Highlights Money Laundering Fri, 27 Dec 2024 09:00:37 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84327