Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
The CESTAT upheld the duty demand, confiscation of imported goods for non-fulfilment of export obligation u/s 111(o), imposition of redemption fine u/s 125, and penalties of Rs.5,00,000/- on Appellant 1 and Rs.2,00,000/- each on Appellants 2 and 3 of the Customs Act, 1962. The duty quantified, redemption fine and penalties imposed in the impugned order were found correct and sustainable. The appeal was dismissed.
The CESTAT upheld the duty demand, confiscation of imported goods for non-fulfilment of export obligation u/s 111(o), imposition of redemption fine u/s 125, and penalties of Rs.5,00,000/- on Appellant 1 and Rs.2,00,000/- each on Appellants 2 and 3 of the Customs Act, 1962. The duty quantified, redemption fine and penalties imposed in the impugned order were found correct and sustainable. The appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
