Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Unauthorised supervisory approval in a section 143(3) assessment following survey proceedings is not supported by statute, as section 133A does not require prior approval from a superior authority. The notes state that an Assessing Officer who consults or seeks such approval abdicates independent quasi-judicial discretion, vitiating the assessment. Applying this principle, the assessment was quashed and the remaining grounds were treated as academic.
Unauthorised supervisory approval in a section 143(3) assessment following survey proceedings is not supported by statute, as section 133A does not require prior approval from a superior authority. The notes state that an Assessing Officer who consults or seeks such approval abdicates independent quasi-judicial discretion, vitiating the assessment. Applying this principle, the assessment was quashed and the remaining grounds were treated as academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
