<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Imported goods seized, heavy penalties for export obligation violation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84153</link>
    <description>The CESTAT upheld the duty demand, confiscation of imported goods for non-fulfilment of export obligation u/s 111(o), imposition of redemption fine u/s 125, and penalties of Rs.5,00,000/- on Appellant 1 and Rs.2,00,000/- each on Appellants 2 and 3 of the Customs Act, 1962. The duty quantified, redemption fine and penalties imposed in the impugned order were found correct and sustainable. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 08:46:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 08:46:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Imported goods seized, heavy penalties for export obligation violation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84153</link>
      <description>The CESTAT upheld the duty demand, confiscation of imported goods for non-fulfilment of export obligation u/s 111(o), imposition of redemption fine u/s 125, and penalties of Rs.5,00,000/- on Appellant 1 and Rs.2,00,000/- each on Appellants 2 and 3 of the Customs Act, 1962. The duty quantified, redemption fine and penalties imposed in the impugned order were found correct and sustainable. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 08:46:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>