Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
The High Court addressed a challenge to an assessment order due to discrepancies in turnover between GSTR-7 and GSTR-3B. The petitioner failed to respond to notices preceding the order. The court noted that had the petitioner responded, the outcome may have been different. The petitioner is granted a fresh chance to present their case. The impugned order is set aside, and the case is remitted back for a new order, with the condition that the petitioner deposits 10% of disputed tax within 30 days. The petition is disposed of.
The High Court addressed a challenge to an assessment order due to discrepancies in turnover between GSTR-7 and GSTR-3B. The petitioner failed to respond to notices preceding the order. The court noted that had the petitioner responded, the outcome may have been different. The petitioner is granted a fresh chance to present their case. The impugned order is set aside, and the case is remitted back for a new order, with the condition that the petitioner deposits 10% of disputed tax within 30 days. The petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
