https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80401 The High Court addressed a challenge to an assessment order due to discrepancies in turnover between GSTR-7 and GSTR-3B. The petitioner failed to respond to notices preceding the order. The court noted that had the petitioner responded, the outcome may have been different. The petitioner is granted a fresh chance to present their case. The impugned order is set aside, and the case is remitted back for a new order, with the condition that the petitioner deposits 10% of disputed tax within 30 days. The petition is disposed of. en-us Tue, 13 Aug 2024 07:08:44 +0530 Tue, 13 Aug 2024 07:08:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80401 The High Court addressed a challenge to an assessment order due to discrepancies in turnover between GSTR-7 and GSTR-3B. The petitioner failed to respond to notices preceding the order. The court noted that had the petitioner responded, the outcome may have been different. The petitioner is granted a fresh chance to present their case. The impugned order is set aside, and the case is remitted back for a new order, with the condition that the petitioner deposits 10% of disputed tax within 30 days. The petition is disposed of. Highlights GST Tue, 13 Aug 2024 07:08:44 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80401