TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>HC Quashes Tax Assessment Order, Directs 10% Tax Deposit and Fresh Evaluation with Proper Hearing for Contractor</h1> <h3>Sundarapandian, S/o. Perumal Versus The State Tax Officer – 1, The Joint Commissioner (ST) (Intelligence), The State Tax Officer (ST) (FAC), Kulithalai</h3> Sundarapandian, S/o. Perumal Versus The State Tax Officer – 1, The Joint Commissioner (ST) (Intelligence), The State Tax Officer (ST) (FAC), Kulithalai - ... The petitioner challenged an Assessment Order for the Assessment Year 2020-2021. The impugned order confirmed demands from previous notices due to petitioner's failure to respond. The petitioner, a Government Contractor, seeks an opportunity to reply. The High Court sets aside the impugned order, remits the case back for fresh assessment, and requires the petitioner to deposit 10% of disputed tax within 30 days. The first respondent must pass fresh orders within two months, allowing the petitioner to file a reply and be heard.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
