Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The NCLAT upheld the admission of Section 7 application against the corporate debtor (corporate guarantor) despite the contention that its sole asset might be insufficient to resolve insolvency. The court ruled that initiation of CIRP is consequent to debt and default by the corporate debtor, which is evident. The corporate debtor's inability to pay debt cannot preclude insolvency proceedings on the ground of insufficient assets. These issues must be addressed during CIRP and cannot justify setting aside the admission order u/s 7, especially since insolvency proceedings have also commenced against the principal borrower. The appeal was dismissed as lacking merit.
The NCLAT upheld the admission of Section 7 application against the corporate debtor (corporate guarantor) despite the contention that its sole asset might be insufficient to resolve insolvency. The court ruled that initiation of CIRP is consequent to debt and default by the corporate debtor, which is evident. The corporate debtor's inability to pay debt cannot preclude insolvency proceedings on the ground of insufficient assets. These issues must be addressed during CIRP and cannot justify setting aside the admission order u/s 7, especially since insolvency proceedings have also commenced against the principal borrower. The appeal was dismissed as lacking merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.