Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

NCLAT Upholds Section 7 Application Against Corporate Guarantor; Insufficient Assets Not a Barrier to Insolvency Process.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The NCLAT upheld the admission of Section 7 application against the corporate debtor (corporate guarantor) despite the contention that its sole asset might be insufficient to resolve insolvency. The court ruled that initiation of CIRP is consequent to debt and default by the corporate debtor, which is evident. The corporate debtor's inability to pay debt cannot preclude insolvency proceedings on the ground of insufficient assets. These issues must be addressed during CIRP and cannot justify setting aside the admission order u/s 7, especially since insolvency proceedings have also commenced against the principal borrower. The appeal was dismissed as lacking merit.....