Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Unexplained money u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE(1) - no explanation regarding source of cash deposit in savings account - case selected for limited scrutiny, thus recharacterization of income as unexplained u/s 69A beyond scope of limited scrutiny, liable to be struck down. Scope of limited scrutiny upheld for verifying demonetization cash deposits. Cash deposits in November 2016 governed by pre-amended Section 115BBE. Assessee failed to explain nature and source of cash deposit, rightly treated as unexplained money u/s 69A. Income disclosed under "income from other sources" cannot be treated as explained source for cash deposit. Tax rightly levied at 60% u/s 115BBE(1) on unexplained money. Appeal dismissed.
Unexplained money u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE(1) - no explanation regarding source of cash deposit in savings account - case selected for limited scrutiny, thus recharacterization of income as unexplained u/s 69A beyond scope of limited scrutiny, liable to be struck down. Scope of limited scrutiny upheld for verifying demonetization cash deposits. Cash deposits in November 2016 governed by pre-amended Section 115BBE. Assessee failed to explain nature and source of cash deposit, rightly treated as unexplained money u/s 69A. Income disclosed under "income from other sources" cannot be treated as explained source for cash deposit. Tax rightly levied at 60% u/s 115BBE(1) on unexplained money. Appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
