<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cash deposits in Nov 2016 unexplained, rightly taxed at 60% u/s 115BBE. Limited scrutiny scope upheld for demonetization verification.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79414</link>
    <description>Unexplained money u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE(1) - no explanation regarding source of cash deposit in savings account - case selected for limited scrutiny, thus recharacterization of income as unexplained u/s 69A beyond scope of limited scrutiny, liable to be struck down. Scope of limited scrutiny upheld for verifying demonetization cash deposits. Cash deposits in November 2016 governed by pre-amended Section 115BBE. Assessee failed to explain nature and source of cash deposit, rightly treated as unexplained money u/s 69A. Income disclosed under &quot;income from other sources&quot; cannot be treated as explained source for cash deposit. Tax rightly levied at 60% u/s 115BBE(1) on unexplained money. Appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:18:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:18:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cash deposits in Nov 2016 unexplained, rightly taxed at 60% u/s 115BBE. Limited scrutiny scope upheld for demonetization verification.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79414</link>
      <description>Unexplained money u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE(1) - no explanation regarding source of cash deposit in savings account - case selected for limited scrutiny, thus recharacterization of income as unexplained u/s 69A beyond scope of limited scrutiny, liable to be struck down. Scope of limited scrutiny upheld for verifying demonetization cash deposits. Cash deposits in November 2016 governed by pre-amended Section 115BBE. Assessee failed to explain nature and source of cash deposit, rightly treated as unexplained money u/s 69A. Income disclosed under &quot;income from other sources&quot; cannot be treated as explained source for cash deposit. Tax rightly levied at 60% u/s 115BBE(1) on unexplained money. Appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:18:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>