Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Cash deposits in Nov 2016 unexplained, rightly taxed at 60% u/s 115BBE. Limited scrutiny scope upheld for demonetization verification.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Unexplained money u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE(1) - no explanation regarding source of cash deposit in savings account - case selected for limited scrutiny, thus recharacterization of income as unexplained u/s 69A beyond scope of limited scrutiny, liable to be struck down. Scope of limited scrutiny upheld for verifying demonetization cash deposits. Cash deposits in November 2016 governed by pre-amended Section 115BBE. Assessee failed to explain nature and source of cash deposit, rightly treated as unexplained money u/s 69A. Income disclosed under "income from other sources" cannot be treated as explained source for cash deposit. Tax rightly levied at 60% u/s 115BBE(1) on unexplained money. Appeal dismissed.....