Chapter XIX exclusion applies to payments received by the International Rice Research Institute, subject to specified privileges and immunities condit...
Section 74 requires more than wrongful availment or utilisation of input tax credit: fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts with intent to evade tax must be alleged and proved. Under the former Explanation 2, suppression covered failure to declare legally required information or failure to provide information sought in writing, but did not remove the intent requirement. Disclosures in returns, annual reconciliations and portal filings materially weaken a non-declaration allegation. Mere audit detection or non-response to audit communications does not independently establish suppression, particularly where the notice did not plead that basis. Section 74 proceedings and enhanced penalties therefore require evidence of deliberate concealment, and appellate review cannot sustain a demand on a materially new allegation beyond the show cause notice.
Section 74 requires more than wrongful availment or utilisation of input tax credit: fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts with intent to evade tax must be alleged and proved. Under the former Explanation 2, suppression covered failure to declare legally required information or failure to provide information sought in writing, but did not remove the intent requirement. Disclosures in returns, annual reconciliations and portal filings materially weaken a non-declaration allegation. Mere audit detection or non-response to audit communications does not independently establish suppression, particularly where the notice did not plead that basis. Section 74 proceedings and enhanced penalties therefore require evidence of deliberate concealment, and appellate review cannot sustain a demand on a materially new allegation beyond the show cause notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
