Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioners were entitled to default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on the ground that the complaint was incomplete because further investigation continued after filing of the complaint and cognizance had been taken.
Analysis: The complaint was filed within the statutory period. The governing principle is that the right to default bail arises only when the investigation remains pending and the charge-sheet or complaint has not been filed within time. Once a complaint containing the ingredients of the alleged offence is filed and cognizance is taken, the mere fact that further or supplementary investigation continues does not render the complaint incomplete or revive the right to default bail. The Court relied on the settled position that further investigation under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 may continue after filing of the main report, and that such subsequent investigation does not by itself invalidate the completed complaint.
Conclusion: The petitioners were not entitled to default bail, and the claim for release on that ground failed.
Final Conclusion: The applications for bail were rejected on the ground that the complaint was complete for purposes of Section 167(2) and the pendency of further investigation did not create an enforceable right to default bail.
Ratio Decidendi: Filing of a complaint or charge-sheet within the statutory period defeats the claim to default bail, and subsequent further investigation does not make that complaint incomplete unless the report itself fails to disclose the commission of the offence.