Liberal condonation and Section 10 of the General Clauses Act applied to an NGT appeal filed after a holiday deadline.

Section 10 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 applies to appeals under Section 16 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 unless expressly excluded, so an appeal filed on the next working day after the period expired could not be treated as time-barred merely because the last day fell on a Sunday. The expression "sufficient cause" for condonation must be construed liberally, with bona fides and absence of negligence remaining relevant. On that approach, the explanation for delay in an environmental clearance matter was accepted, the refusal to condone was held erroneous, and the delay was condoned so the appeal could proceed on merits before the Tribunal.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether Section 10 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 applies to appeals under Section 16 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 so as to treat an appeal filed on the next working day after expiry of the prescribed period as in time; (ii) Whether the National Green Tribunal erred in refusing to condone the delay on the ground that no sufficient cause was shown.

Issue (i): Whether Section 10 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 applies to appeals under Section 16 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 so as to treat an appeal filed on the next working day after expiry of the prescribed period as in time.

Analysis: Section 16 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 prescribes a 30-day period for appeal and permits a further period of 60 days on sufficient cause being shown. The exclusion of the Limitation Act does not displace the general rule in Section 10 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, which applies to Central Acts where the last day falls on a day when the court or office is closed. The statutory scheme of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 contains no indication that Section 10 is excluded. The appeal, therefore, could not be rejected merely because the last day of the extended period fell on a Sunday.

Conclusion: Section 10 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 applies to appeals under Section 16 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010.

Issue (ii): Whether the National Green Tribunal erred in refusing to condone the delay on the ground that no sufficient cause was shown.

Analysis: The expression "sufficient cause" must receive a liberal and justice-oriented construction, while still requiring bona fides and absence of negligence. In matters involving environmental clearances, the papers are often voluminous and technical, and an affected litigant may reasonably need expert and professional assistance before filing an appeal. The explanation offered for the delay was not implausible or lacking in bona fides. The refusal to condone the delay proceeded on an unduly narrow view of the governing law and the factual explanation.

Conclusion: The refusal to condone the delay was erroneous and the delay ought to have been condoned.

Final Conclusion: The order of the National Green Tribunal was set aside, the delay in filing the appeal before the Tribunal was condoned, and the matter was directed to proceed on merits before the Tribunal in accordance with law.

Ratio Decidendi: Section 10 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 applies to a special-law appeal unless expressly excluded, and the standard of sufficient cause for condonation must be applied liberally where the explanation is bona fide and not negligent.

---