ITAT upholds transfer pricing comparables exclusion, sets 15% UPS depreciation, denies interest claim under Section 234C

ITAT Mumbai upheld the TPO's selection and exclusion of comparables for determining ALP in transfer pricing, affirming the exclusion of companies with dissimilar functions, capital intensity, or revenue profiles. The AO was directed to compute the profit ratio using the arithmetic mean of the approved comparables. Depreciation on UPS was held at 15%, as UPS is not integral to the computer system. The claim for interest under Section 234C was rejected due to no shortfall in advance tax payments. The decision was against the assessee on depreciation but favorable regarding interest liability and comparable selection.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Adjustment of international transactions of Fees for Software Development and Related Services at Rs. 88,49,974/-.
2. Application of depreciation @60% on UPS instead of 15%.
3. Computation of interest liability for sum of Rs. 46,825/- under Section 234C.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

Adjustment of International Transactions of Fees for Software Development and Related Services at Rs. 88,49,974/-
1. Factual Matrix:
- The assessee, a subsidiary of 'Telcordia Technologies Inc. USA,' engaged in software and services for various communication networks, earned a compensation equaling its total operating cost plus a 15% mark-up.
- The international transactions included fees for marketing, technical support, software development, and related services.

2. Transfer Pricing Study:
- The assessee used the 'Transaction Net Margin Method' (TNMM) to establish the arm's length price (ALP) and identified 18 comparable companies.
- The TPO rejected the comparables and conducted a fresh analysis, selecting 28 companies, resulting in an arithmetic mean of 27.96%, leading to an adjustment of Rs. 1,18,00,978/-.

3. Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP):
- The DRP directed the TPO to verify three entities but confirmed the other companies and their profit margins.
- The final arithmetic mean of 27 comparables was 24.72%, leading to an adjustment of Rs. 88,49,974/- added to the assessee's income.

4. Assessee's Objections:
- The assessee contested 8 out of 27 comparable companies, arguing that certain companies should not be considered due to different business operations or incorrect profit calculations.

5. Tribunal's Analysis:
- R Systems International Ltd (Segment): The tribunal upheld the TPO's exclusion of doubtful debts and advances from operating expenses.
- Lucid Software Limited: Excluded due to significant product development expenditure.
- Celestial Labs Ltd.: Included as more than 95% of revenue was from services.
- Infosys Technologies Ltd.: Excluded due to significant intangible assets and different business scale.
- Wipro Ltd.: Excluded due to its global operations and product sales.
- Flextronics Software Systems Ltd.: Included as 90% of revenue was from services.
- Tata Elxsi Limited: Excluded due to different nature of services.
- Avani Cincom Technologies Ltd.: Excluded due to lack of segmental details.

6. Final Directions:
- The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to determine the profit ratio after excluding the five disputed entities and apply the +/- 5% range as per Section 92C(2).

Application of Depreciation @60% on UPS Instead of 15%
1. Factual Matrix:
- The assessee claimed depreciation at 15% on UPS used for various office and IT equipment.
- The DRP directed depreciation at 60%, enhancing the total claim.

2. Assessee's Argument:
- The assessee relied on the ITAT Delhi Bench decision in Nestle India Ltd., arguing that UPS should be depreciated at 15%.

3. Tribunal's Decision:
- The tribunal agreed with the assessee, holding that UPS, used for office equipment and plant machinery, should be depreciated at 15%, subject to verification by the Assessing Officer.

Computation of Interest Liability for Sum of Rs. 46,825/- Under Section 234C
1. Factual Matrix:
- The assessee's return of income resulted in a tax liability fully covered by advance tax and TDS.
- The Assessing Officer computed interest under Section 234C for shortfall in advance tax payments.

2. Tribunal's Analysis:
- The tribunal examined the advance tax payments and found no shortfall in any quarter.

3. Tribunal's Decision:
- The interest liability of Rs. 46,825/- under Section 234C was deleted.

Conclusion:
The appeal was partly allowed with directions to the Assessing Officer to re-evaluate the comparables for determining the arm's length price, apply the appropriate depreciation rate for UPS, and delete the interest liability under Section 234C.

---