TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court Upholds Transfer Pricing Decision, Modifies Risk Adjustments</h1> <h3>Commissioner Of Income Tax -III The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax Circle 12 (5) Bangalore. Versus M/s. Yodlee Infotech Pvt. Ltd.</h3> Commissioner Of Income Tax -III The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax Circle 12 (5) Bangalore. Versus M/s. Yodlee Infotech Pvt. Ltd. - TMI Issues:1. Transfer Pricing adjustments based on functional similarity of comparables.2. Risk adjustment in Transfer Pricing analysis.3. Exclusion of certain expenses from total turnover for deduction computation under Section 10B.4. Correct computation of deduction under Section 10B based on judicial precedents.Issue 1: Transfer Pricing AdjustmentsThe appeal involved the question of whether the Tribunal was correct in excluding certain companies as comparables without considering the functional similarity with the assessee. The Tribunal had relied on previous orders without delving into the merits of each case. The High Court observed that the Tribunal had indeed examined the functional similarity of the assessee in detail. Consequently, the first substantial question of law did not arise for consideration in the case.Issue 2: Risk Adjustment in Transfer Pricing AnalysisThe Tribunal had remitted the issue of market risk adjustment to the Assessing Officer based on cited decisions. The High Court modified the directions, directing the Assessing Officer to determine the market risk adjustment issue afresh in accordance with the law. Thus, the second substantial question of law was answered in this context.Issue 3: Exclusion of Expenses for Deduction ComputationRegarding the exclusion of certain expenses from total turnover for deduction under Section 10B, the Tribunal had held in favor of the assessee. The High Court noted that the third and fourth substantial questions of law were against the revenue and were covered by the Supreme Court decision in 'COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III VS. HCL TECHNOLOGIES LTD.' 404 ITR 719. Therefore, the High Court disposed of the appeal based on the analysis provided.This judgment dealt with intricate Transfer Pricing issues, including functional similarity assessments, risk adjustments, and computation of deductions under Section 10B. The High Court's detailed analysis and alignment with relevant judicial precedents ensured a comprehensive resolution of the appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
