Transfer pricing case: Appeals partially allowed, depreciation claims upheld, comparables rejected.

The Tribunal partly allowed both the assessee's and the Revenue's appeals in a transfer pricing case. It directed the exclusion of certain comparables and remanded specific issues for fresh consideration. Depreciation on software and goodwill was allowed, and the assessee's claim for higher depreciation on servers and network equipment was upheld. The Tribunal disagreed with the working capital adjustment and rejected certain comparables, citing functional dissimilarities and diversified services.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Transfer Pricing Adjustments
2. Rejection of Comparables
3. Working Capital Adjustment
4. Depreciation Disallowance on Software and Goodwill
5. Inclusion and Exclusion of Specific Companies as Comparables
6. Depreciation on Servers and Network Equipment

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Transfer Pricing Adjustments:
The assessee challenged the TP adjustment of Rs. 29,15,57,492/- made by the AO/TPO. The CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal, but the assessee was aggrieved by the rejection of certain comparables and the working capital adjustment. The CIT(A) directed the inclusion of Akshay Software Technologies Ltd. and LGS Global Ltd., and the exclusion of Kals Information Systems Ltd. However, the CIT(A) upheld the inclusion of ICRA Techno Analytics Ltd., Infosys Ltd., Persistent Systems Ltd., and Tata Elxsi Ltd. The CIT(A) also rejected the working capital adjustment granted by the TPO.

2. Rejection of Comparables:
The assessee argued for the exclusion of ICRA Techno Analytics Ltd., Infosys Ltd., Persistent Systems Ltd., and Tata Elxsi Ltd. The Tribunal agreed with the assessee, citing functional dissimilarities and the inclusion of diversified services, and directed the AO/TPO to exclude these companies from the list of comparables.

3. Working Capital Adjustment:
The CIT(A) rejected the assessee's claim for a working capital adjustment on actuals without an ad-hoc upper cap. The Tribunal did not specifically address this issue in the final order, implying acceptance of the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the entire working capital adjustment granted by the TPO.

4. Depreciation Disallowance on Software and Goodwill:
The assessee contested the disallowance of depreciation on software and goodwill. The Tribunal, referencing the Supreme Court judgment in Engineering Analysis Center of Excellence Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT, directed that depreciation on software capitalized by the assessee should be allowed. Similarly, depreciation on goodwill was allowed, following the Supreme Court judgment in CIT vs. Simfs Securities Ltd.

5. Inclusion and Exclusion of Specific Companies as Comparables:
- ICRA Techno Analytics Ltd.: Excluded due to functional differences and lack of segmental data.
- Infosys Ltd.: Excluded due to its significant brand value, high turnover, and diversified services.
- Persistent Systems Ltd.: Excluded due to involvement in product development and lack of segmental data.
- Tata Elxsi Ltd.: Excluded due to its engagement in diversified activities within the software development segment.
- Cat Technologies Ltd.: Remanded to AO/TPO for verification of related party transactions.
- LGS Global Ltd.: Remanded to CIT(A) for fresh consideration regarding forex earnings repatriation.
- KALS Information Systems Ltd.: Excluded due to involvement in software product business.
- Akshay Software Technologies Ltd.: Included as it passes all filters and is functionally comparable.

6. Depreciation on Servers and Network Equipment:
The Tribunal upheld the assessee's claim for depreciation at 60% on servers and network equipment, following its decision in the assessee's own case for the previous assessment year.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal partly allowed both the assessee's and the Revenue's appeals. The Tribunal directed the exclusion of certain comparables and remanded specific issues for fresh consideration. Depreciation on software and goodwill was allowed, and the assessee's claim for higher depreciation on servers and network equipment was upheld.

---