Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2013 (11) TMI 190 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal rules for assessee in Transfer Pricing case; no adjustment needed. Section 10A deduction computed favorably. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in the case involving Transfer Pricing Adjustment for Software Designing and Development Services. The ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal rules for assessee in Transfer Pricing case; no adjustment needed. Section 10A deduction computed favorably.

                          The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in the case involving Transfer Pricing Adjustment for Software Designing and Development Services. The Tribunal excluded certain companies and adjusted the comparables, ultimately determining that no transfer pricing adjustment was warranted as the assessee's net margin fell within an acceptable range. Additionally, in the computation of deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, the Tribunal directed the AO to exclude specified expenses from both export and total turnover, resulting in the appeal being partly allowed.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment for Software Designing and Development Services.
                          2. Computation of Deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment for Software Designing and Development Services:

                          Facts and Methodology:
                          The assessee, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Witness Systems Inc. (WSI), provided software designing and development services to its holding company. The assessee filed a transfer pricing analysis using the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) with the net margin on cost as the Profit Level Indicator (PLI). The PLI was calculated at 12.21%.

                          Comparables and Filters:
                          The assessee selected 11 comparables with an arithmetic mean of 11.81% after applying specific filters. The TPO rejected some filters and selected 26 comparables, ultimately suggesting an addition of Rs. 2,05,82,039 based on an adjusted mean margin of 22.67%.

                          Tribunal's Analysis and Decision:
                          The Tribunal examined the comparability of the 26 companies chosen by the TPO, referencing previous decisions in similar cases. It was held that companies with a turnover exceeding Rs. 200 crores should be excluded, following the precedent set in Trilogy E-Business Software India (P.) Ltd. The Tribunal also excluded companies functionally different from the assessee or with significant related party transactions.

                          Exclusions:
                          - Companies with turnovers exceeding Rs. 200 crores, including Flextronics Software Systems Ltd., iGate Global Solutions Ltd., Mindtree Ltd., Persistent Systems Ltd., Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd., Tata Elxsi Ltd., Wipro Ltd., and Infosys Technologies Ltd.
                          - Functionally different companies such as Avani Cimcon Technologies Ltd., Celestial Labs Ltd., KALS Information Systems Ltd., and Accel Transmatic Ltd.
                          - Companies with related party transactions exceeding 15%, including Helio & Matheson Information Technology Ltd. and SIP Technologies & Exports Ltd.
                          - Only the segmental data for software services of Megasoft Ltd. was considered.

                          Final Comparables and Margin:
                          After exclusions, 11 comparables remained, with an arithmetic mean margin of 15.01%. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee's net margin of 12.21% was within the +/- 5% range of the arithmetic mean, thus no TP adjustment was warranted. The addition made by the AO was directed to be deleted.

                          2. Computation of Deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act:

                          Facts and Computation Method:
                          The assessee claimed a deduction under Section 10A without reducing telecommunication and travel expenses from the export turnover. The AO recomputed the deduction by reducing these expenses from the export turnover but not from the total turnover, resulting in a disallowance of Rs. 12,42,705.

                          Tribunal's Analysis and Decision:
                          The Tribunal referenced the Karnataka High Court's decision in CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd., which held that expenses excluded from export turnover should also be excluded from total turnover. The Tribunal directed the AO to reduce the telecommunication and travel expenses from both the export turnover and the total turnover while computing the deduction under Section 10A.

                          Conclusion:
                          The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal deleted the TP adjustment and directed the AO to recompute the Section 10A deduction by excluding the specified expenses from both export and total turnover.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found