Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2011 (8) TMI 952 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Transfer pricing ALP: exclude loss-making/super-profit comparables, use similar-size turnover band, allow rebuttal, adjust infrastructure utilisation ITAT, Bangalore (AT) held that for determining ALP in software/ITES transactions loss-making comparables must be excluded and equally super-profit making ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Transfer pricing ALP: exclude loss-making/super-profit comparables, use similar-size turnover band, allow rebuttal, adjust infrastructure utilisation

                          ITAT, Bangalore (AT) held that for determining ALP in software/ITES transactions loss-making comparables must be excluded and equally super-profit making companies should be excluded; comparables should be of similar size - here a turnover band of Rs.1 crore to Rs.200 crore was appropriate for an assessee with Rs.8.15 crore turnover. The revenue officer may collect contemporaneous market data from third parties without prior disclosure to the assessee, but the assessee must be given an opportunity to rebut material once relevance is established. Adjustments for under-utilisation of infrastructure must be afforded to the assessee as done for manpower.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Natural Justice and Procedure
                          2. Transfer Pricing Adjustments and Comparables
                          3. Data and Information Used by TPO
                          4. ALP Adjustments for ITES Segment
                          5. Low Capacity Utilization Adjustments

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Natural Justice and Procedure:
                          The assessee raised concerns about the principles of natural justice and procedural aspects followed by the AO in making a reference to the TPO and the order passed by the DRP. However, these grounds were not pressed by the assessee and were accordingly rejected.

                          2. Transfer Pricing Adjustments and Comparables:
                          The assessee, engaged in software development and IT-enabled services, challenged the TPO's rejection of its selected comparables and the adoption of new comparables. The TPO had applied additional filters and selected 20 comparables, resulting in a transfer pricing adjustment of Rs. 2,20,12,927/- for the software segment and Rs. 66,38,48/- for the ITES segment. The assessee argued that the transfer pricing adjustments should be restricted to transactions with AE only and that the operating costs and revenues referable to AE transactions should be considered. The Tribunal agreed with the assessee, directing the AO to restrict the adjustments to AE transactions only.

                          3. Data and Information Used by TPO:
                          The assessee contended that the TPO's use of data obtained through notices u/s 133(6) was not transparent and lacked fairness. The Tribunal held that the TPO is authorized to gather information and issue notices to relevant parties under sec.92CA and sec.133(6). However, the assessee must be given an opportunity to rebut any material used against it. The Tribunal found that the TPO had provided all information to the assessee in the form of a CD and allowed the assessee to present its objections. The Tribunal also directed that the assessee should be given an opportunity to cross-examine parties whose replies are used against it.

                          4. ALP Adjustments for ITES Segment:
                          The Tribunal directed the TPO to consider the assessee's objections and compute the ALP for the ITES segment, following the same directions given for the software development service segment. This included considering only the operating revenue and costs of AE transactions, applying a turnover filter of Rs. 1 crore to 200 crores, and providing the assessee an opportunity to cross-examine relevant parties.

                          5. Low Capacity Utilization Adjustments:
                          The assessee argued for adjustments due to under-utilization of infrastructure, which was rejected by the TPO. The Tribunal agreed with the assessee, noting that similar adjustments for under-utilization of manpower were allowed in other cases. The Tribunal directed the AO to consider the adjustment for under-utilization of infrastructure while determining the ALP.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the TPO to:
                          - Consider only the operating revenue and costs of AE transactions.
                          - Apply a turnover filter of Rs. 1 crore to 200 crores.
                          - Provide all relevant information to the assessee.
                          - Allow the assessee to cross-examine parties whose replies are used against it.
                          - Consider the assessee's objections to additional comparables.
                          - Grant a standard deduction of 5% under the proviso to sec.92C(2).
                          - Consider adjustments for under-utilization of infrastructure in the ITES segment.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found