Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal instructs adjustments in Transfer Pricing case, reduces TP amount.</h1> The Tribunal directed the exclusion of certain comparables and adjustment of margins in a Transfer Pricing (TP) case involving software development ... TP Adjustment - adjustment on provision for software development services - comparable selection - upper limit of the turnover for exclusion of companies having higher turnover - HELD THAT:- In the instant case, the assessee’s turnover is only Rs.40.87 crore. TPO / DRP had excluded companies having turnover of less than Rs.1 crore, however, the TPO / DRP has not put upper limit of the turnover for exclusion of companies having higher turnover. In deciding the above ground, the Tribunal in the case of Barracuda Networks India Private Limited [2022 (5) TMI 322 - ITAT BANGALORE], considered various judicial pronouncements and held that companies whose turnover is exceeding Rs.200 crore has to be excluded. In this case, the assessee’s turnover is Rs.40.87 crore and the assessee cannot be compared to the companies having high turnover exceeding Rs.200 crore. Therefore we direct the AO / TPO to exclude Larsen & Toubro Infotech Limited, Nihilient Technologies Limited, Persistent Systems Limited, Thirdware Solutions Limited, Infosys Limited, Aspire Systems (India) Private Limited and Cybage Software Private Limited, from the list of comparables. Also we direct the AO / TPO to include R S Software (India) Limited as a comparable company. However, the margins of the said company for assessment years 2014-2015 and 2015-2016 have to be ignored since the turnover exceeded Rs.200 crore for the said period. It is ordered accordingly. Adjustment on Interest on delayed receivables - We direct the AO / TPO to redo the transfer pricing analysis in respect of interest on outstanding receivables by taking into account the directions of the Tribunal in assessee’s own case for assessment year 2008-2009 [2016 (10) TMI 1211 - ITAT BANGALORE] TDS u/s 195 - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) - HELD THAT:- The assessee has produced End Users License Agreement (EULA) - AR has taken us through various clauses, especially, clause 9, wherein he emphasized that the assessee does not acquire any right, title or interest in any IPR - Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence (P.) Ltd. [2021 (3) TMI 138 - SUPREME COURT] had clearly held that amounts paid by the resident end users to non-resident computer software manufacturer / suppliers for use of computer software through EULA is not payment of royalty for the use of copyright in computer software and the same does not give rise to any income taxable in India as a result of which the payer is not liable for TDS u/s 195 - we restore the issue to the files of the A.O. A.O. is directed to examine the EULA entered by the assessee with XGISL and decide the issue afresh. A.O. shall follow the dictum laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence (P.) Ltd. v. CIT (supra) while taking a decision in the said matter. Issues Involved:1. TP adjustment on provision for software development services (adjustment of Rs.3,47,04,593).2. Interest on delayed receivables (adjustment amounting to Rs.83,55,708).3. Corporate Tax Issues – Disallowance of software expenses due to non-deduction of TDS.Detailed Analysis:1. TP Adjustment on Provision for Software Development Services:The assessee, a public limited company providing software development services, had its international transaction scrutinized, leading to a TP adjustment of Rs.3,47,04,593. The TPO rejected the assessee's TP study, which included 12 comparables with a median margin of 10.07%, and instead selected 17 comparables with a median margin of 25.64%. The DRP partly allowed the assessee's objections, reducing the TP adjustment to Rs.3,47,04,593 by excluding certain comparables and including others. The Tribunal, following the precedent set in Barracuda Networks India Private Limited, directed the exclusion of seven comparables with turnovers exceeding Rs.200 crore and adjusted the margins of R S Software (India) Limited by excluding its margins for assessment years 2014-2015 and 2015-2016. The Tribunal ordered the AO/TPO to re-compute the ALP accordingly.2. Interest on Delayed Receivables:The TPO re-characterized trade receivables from AEs as loans and imputed interest on delayed receivables, resulting in an adjustment of Rs.83,55,708. The assessee argued that the impact of extended credit periods is subsumed by working capital adjustments. The Tribunal, referencing its own decision in the assessee's case for assessment year 2014-2015, directed the AO/TPO to re-do the TP analysis, considering working capital adjustments and the industry-standard credit period. The Tribunal emphasized that if the international transaction is found to be at arm's length after adjustments, no separate adjustment for delayed receivables is warranted.3. Corporate Tax Issues – Disallowance of Software Expenses Due to Non-Deduction of TDS:The assessee made payments to Xchanging Global Insurance Solutions Limited (XGISL), UK, amounting to Rs.50,20,109, claimed as reimbursements for cloud-based applications/tools. The AO disallowed the expenditure under section 40(a)(i) of the I.T.Act, treating it as payment for software licenses and thus subject to TDS. The DRP upheld the AO's decision, relying on the Karnataka High Court's judgment in CIT v Samsung Electronics Ltd. The Tribunal, however, restored the issue to the AO, directing an examination of the End Users License Agreement (EULA) in light of the Supreme Court's judgment in Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence (P.) Ltd. v. CIT, which held that payments for software through EULA are not royalties and not taxable in India, thus not requiring TDS.Conclusion:The Tribunal provided detailed directions for re-computation and re-examination of the TP adjustments and corporate tax issues, emphasizing adherence to judicial precedents and proper application of legal principles. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found