TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal directs TPO to recompute ALP for Software Development Services, excluding comparables and allowing adjustments. 'sLengthPrice</h1> <h3>M/s. Atmecs Technologies Private Limited Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1 (1) (1), Bengaluru</h3> M/s. Atmecs Technologies Private Limited Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1 (1) (1), Bengaluru - TMI Issues Involved:1. Determination of Arm's Length Price (ALP) for Software Development Services.2. Selection of the tested party in Transfer Pricing.3. Application of turnover filter in choosing comparable companies.4. Grant of adjustments for working capital, risk, and capacity utilization.Detailed Analysis:1. Determination of Arm's Length Price (ALP) for Software Development Services:The primary issue in the appeal concerns the determination of the ALP for the international transaction of rendering Software Development Services (SWD services) to the Associated Enterprise (AE), Atmecs Inc., USA. The assessee used the Transaction Net Margin Method (TNMM) with the Operating Profit/Operating Revenue (OP/OR) as the Profit Level Indicator (PLI). The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) rejected the assessee's Transfer Pricing (TP) study, which had chosen the foreign AE as the tested party and selected 7 comparable companies from North America. The TPO instead conducted an independent search for comparables using Indian companies and arrived at a set of 13 comparable companies, leading to an adjustment of Rs. 5,28,04,851/- to the assessee's total income.2. Selection of the Tested Party in Transfer Pricing:The TPO rejected the assessee's choice of the foreign AE as the tested party, citing that the Indian transfer pricing regulations do not support selecting a foreign AE as the tested party. The TPO argued that the tested party should be the one with the least complex functional analysis and for which reliable data is available without significant adjustments. The Tribunal, however, referred to the OECD guidelines and the UN TP Manual, which allow for the selection of a foreign AE as the tested party if it is the least complex entity and reliable data is available. The Tribunal remanded the issue back to the TPO for fresh consideration, directing the TPO to examine the claim of the foreign AE as the tested party.3. Application of Turnover Filter in Choosing Comparable Companies:The assessee challenged the inclusion of certain high-turnover companies as comparables, arguing that companies with high turnover should be excluded just as companies with low turnover were excluded. The Tribunal upheld the assessee's contention, citing various decisions, including those of the ITAT Bangalore Bench, which favored excluding companies with significantly higher turnover than the assessee. The Tribunal directed the exclusion of 8 companies with turnovers exceeding Rs. 200 Crores from the list of comparables.4. Grant of Adjustments for Working Capital, Risk, and Capacity Utilization:The Tribunal addressed the assessee's grievances regarding the denial of adjustments for working capital, risk, and capacity utilization:- Working Capital Adjustment: The Tribunal, following previous decisions, directed the TPO to allow working capital adjustments after examining the details furnished by the assessee.- Risk Adjustment: The Tribunal remanded the issue to the TPO, directing the assessee to provide specific details and computations for risk adjustment.- Capacity Utilization Adjustment: The Tribunal recognized the need for capacity utilization adjustment, especially for newly established entities. It directed the TPO to obtain necessary data from comparable companies using powers under section 133(6) of the Act and allow appropriate adjustments.Conclusion:The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the TPO/AO to recompute the ALP for the international transaction, considering the directions provided, including the exclusion of certain high-turnover comparables and the allowance of adjustments for working capital, risk, and capacity utilization. The issue of selecting the foreign AE as the tested party was remanded for fresh consideration.
TaxTMI 