Appeal partly allowed: Recompute Arm's Length Price for Software Development Services

The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer/Assessing Officer to recompute the Arm's Length Price of the international transaction for Software Development Services, excluding certain companies based on turnover and Related Party Transaction filters. The Assessing Officer was also instructed not to set off losses of non-Section 10A units against profits of Section 10A units before allowing the deduction under Section 10A, following the Supreme Court's decision in Yokogawa India Ltd.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Determination of Arm's Length Price (ALP) for Software Development Services.
2. Choice of comparable companies and application of turnover filter.
3. Exclusion of R.S. Software (India) Ltd. based on Related Party Transaction (RPT) filter.
4. Corporate tax issue regarding set-off and carry forward of business loss in relation to Section 10AA of the Income Tax Act.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Determination of Arm's Length Price (ALP) for Software Development Services:
The Assessee, engaged in providing Software Development Services to its Associated Enterprise (AE), filed a Transfer Pricing Study (TP Study) using the Transaction Net Margin Method (TNMM) to justify the price paid in the international transaction as at ALP. The Assessee selected Operating Profit/Operating Cost (OP/OC) as the Profit Level Indicator (PLI) for comparison. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) accepted TNMM as the Most Appropriate Method (MAM) and used the same PLI. The TPO identified 13 comparable companies and computed the ALP, resulting in an addition of Rs. 1,53,10,085/- to the total income of the Assessee.

2. Choice of Comparable Companies and Application of Turnover Filter:
The Assessee contested the inclusion of certain companies with high turnover as comparables. The Tribunal noted that the Assessee's turnover was Rs. 18.52 Crores, and companies with turnover exceeding Rs. 200 Crores should be excluded. The Tribunal upheld the principle that high turnover is a ground for exclusion, following the decision in Dell International Services India (P) Ltd. vs. DCIT and Autodesk India Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT. Consequently, companies listed in Ground No. 16, except Inteq Software Pvt. Ltd., were directed to be excluded if their turnover exceeded Rs. 200 Crores for the relevant financial years.

3. Exclusion of R.S. Software (India) Ltd. Based on Related Party Transaction (RPT) Filter:
The Tribunal addressed the exclusion of R.S. Software (India) Ltd. due to related party transactions exceeding 15%. The Tribunal referenced the Karnataka High Court's decision in Yodlee Infotech Pvt Ltd., which upheld a 15% threshold for RPT filter. Given that R.S. Software (India) Ltd. had a 17.52% RPT, the Tribunal directed its exclusion from the list of comparables.

4. Corporate Tax Issue Regarding Set-Off and Carry Forward of Business Loss in Relation to Section 10AA:
The Assessee raised an additional ground regarding the set-off of losses of non-10A units against the eligible profits of 10A units. The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court's decision in Yokogawa India Ltd., which held that the deduction under Section 10A should be computed independently for each eligible undertaking before aggregation of income and set-off of losses. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the AO not to set off losses of non-10A units against profits of 10A units before allowing the deduction under Section 10A.

Conclusion:
The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal directed the TPO/AO to recompute the ALP of the international transaction of rendering Software Development Services by the Assessee to AE, excluding certain companies based on turnover and RPT filters. Additionally, the AO was instructed not to set off losses of non-10A units against profits of 10A units before allowing the deduction under Section 10A, in accordance with the Supreme Court's ruling in Yokogawa India Ltd.

---