Transfer pricing for software development services: 15% RPT filter upheld, comparables recalculated, inclusions/exclusions remanded, working capital adjustment allowed

In transfer pricing adjustment for software development services, the ITAT held that the related party transactions (RPT) ratio for comparables must be computed consistently on an aggregate basis as (RPT income + RPT expenses) ÷ sales, and directed the AO to recompute accordingly. It affirmed adoption of a 15% RPT filter as judicially upheld, and required fresh verification for certain comparables where functional profile, segmental data, or AY-consistency required examination; comparables lacking reliable financial reporting were to be excluded. It upheld exclusion of an ITeS company as not comparable to software development services, directed inclusion of one functionally comparable company, remanded issues on another company's inclusion and correction of an incorrect comparable margin, and allowed working capital adjustment in line with OECD-based comparability principles.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. General Grounds
2. Transfer Pricing (TP) Legal Issues
3. TP Adjustment in Software Development Segment
4. TP Adjustment in Marketing Support Segment
5. Incorrect Computation of Margin
6. Working Capital Adjustment
7. Miscellaneous Errors in Assessment

Summary:

General Grounds:
Grounds No.1, 4 & 5(i) are general in nature and do not require adjudication. Grounds No.2 & 3, which are legal issues, were not argued by the assessee and thus dismissed as not pressed.

Transfer Pricing (TP) Legal Issues:
The appellant contended that the AO erred in referring the determination of the Arm's Length Price (ALP) of international transactions to the TPO without demonstrating the necessity and expediency for such a reference. The appellant also argued that the lower authorities did not demonstrate any motive of tax evasion by the appellant.

TP Adjustment in Software Development Segment:
The AO made a TP adjustment of Rs. 26,54,86,758/- towards international transactions in the software development segment. The appellant raised several issues, including inappropriate filters and selection of comparables. The Tribunal directed the AO to calculate the Related Party Transaction (RPT) ratio on an aggregate basis and apply a 15% RPT filter. The Tribunal also remanded issues regarding functional comparability and other filters to the DRP for fresh consideration.

TP Adjustment in Marketing Support Segment:
The AO made a TP adjustment of Rs. 3,73,16,901/- towards international transactions in the marketing support segment. The Tribunal remanded the issue to the DRP for fresh adjudication on the exclusion and inclusion of certain comparables based on functional comparability. The appellant's request for exclusion and inclusion of specific companies was also remanded to the DRP for fresh consideration.

Incorrect Computation of Margin:
The appellant contended that the TPO incorrectly computed the operating profit margin of Harbinger Systems Pvt Ltd. The Tribunal remitted this issue to the AO/TPO for verification and correct computation of the margin.

Working Capital Adjustment:
The appellant argued for the grant of working capital adjustment, which was rejected by the TPO and DRP. The Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to grant working capital adjustment following the decisions in similar cases.

Miscellaneous Errors in Assessment:
The appellant pointed out an error in the computation of total income in the final assessment order. The Tribunal remitted this issue to the AO for verification and correct computation of the total income and tax liability. Grounds No.12, 13 & 14 were deemed consequential in nature.

Conclusion:
The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with several issues remanded to the DRP and AO/TPO for fresh adjudication and verification.

---