Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2013 (11) TMI 189 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Directs Arm's Length Price Calculation, Allows Partial Appeal The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer/TPO to work out the Arm's Length Price (ALP) in accordance with its directions. If the differential in the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal Directs Arm's Length Price Calculation, Allows Partial Appeal

                          The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer/TPO to work out the Arm's Length Price (ALP) in accordance with its directions. If the differential in the margin of the assessee and comparables exceeded the 5% bandwidth, an adjustment was required. The assessee's appeal was partly allowed.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Transfer pricing adjustment of Rs.3,25,82,272/- made by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO).

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment:

                          Background:
                          The assessee, a subsidiary of Somero Enterprise Inc., Mauritius, engaged in software services, had international transactions with associated enterprises. The assessee adopted the Transaction Net Margin Method (TNMM) and selected 17 comparables, arriving at an operating margin of 11.81%. The TPO, however, selected 26 comparables and fixed the arithmetical mean at 25.07%, resulting in an adjustment of Rs.3,25,82,272/- under section 92CA of the Act.

                          Assessee's Contentions:
                          - The TPO's rejection of multiple years' data and reliance on Section 133(6) without cross-examination was erroneous.
                          - The TPO's application of the Related Party Transactions (RPT) filter (>25%) was against the Tribunal's reasonable limit of 15%.
                          - The TPO's failure to apply an upper limit to sales turnover and selection of functionally dissimilar comparables was against Tribunal rulings.
                          - The TPO's reduction of Rs.6,19,336/- from operating income was unwarranted as the assessee had already excluded this amount in its TP study.

                          Tribunal's Findings:

                          Turnover Filter:
                          The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the turnover filter, referencing the ICAI TP guidance note and previous Tribunal decisions. Companies with turnover exceeding Rs.200 crores were excluded, including:
                          - Flextronics Software Systems Limited
                          - iGate Global Solutions Limited
                          - Mindtree Limited
                          - Persistent Systems Limited
                          - Sasken Communication Technologies Limited
                          - Tata Elxsi Limited
                          - Wipro Limited
                          - Infosys Technologies Limited

                          Functional Dissimilarity:
                          The Tribunal rejected the following companies for functional dissimilarity, aligning with previous Tribunal decisions:
                          - Accel Transmatic Ltd. (Seg)
                          - Avani Cimcon Technologies Ltd
                          - Celestial Labs. Ltd
                          - KALS Information Systems Ltd (Seg)
                          - Lucid Software Limited

                          Related Party Transactions:
                          The Tribunal directed the exclusion of Ishir Infotech Limited due to RPT exceeding 15%, following the Tribunal's decision in 24/7 Customer Com (P.) Ltd.

                          Calculation of Operating Income and Net Margin:
                          The Tribunal directed the TPO to verify the assessee's claim that Rs.6,19,336/- was already excluded from the operating income. If verified, no further reduction was warranted, potentially adjusting the net margin to 12.2%.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer/TPO to work out the ALP in accordance with the Tribunal's directions. If the differential in the margin of the assessee and comparables exceeded the 5% bandwidth, an adjustment was required. The assessee's appeal was partly allowed.

                          Final Pronouncement:
                          The order was pronounced on the 22nd day of February, 2013 at Bangalore.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found